Maybe I've already written on this topic but, whatever, here are my favourite directors:
1/ Tim Burton 2/ Woody Allen 3/ The Coen Brothers 4/ Alfred Hitchcock 5/ Steven Spielberg 6/ Terry Gilliam 7/ Takeshi Kitano 8/ Mel Brooks 9/ Stanley Kubrick 10/ Billy Wilder
Selection and deciding on great directors was exceptionally difficult, particularly in deciding the distinction between great movie, actor, and director as well as the many directors who have been involved with one, two, three goods movies and either few other movies to their credit or many other movies to their credit (e.g. Paul Thomas Anderson and Punch-Drunk Love, 2002; Magnolia, 1999; Bille August and Smilla's Sense of Snow, 1996; Cameron Crowe; Frank Darabont, Jean-Pierre Jeunet, Lawrence Kasdan, Ang Lee, Anthony Minghella, Christopher Nolan, Alexander Payne, Otto Preminger, Robert Redford, Jim Sheridan) or directors that have focused on specialized genre like animation (e.g. Don Bluth, Wilfred Jackson, or Wolfgang Reitherman) or horror (Roger Corman or David Cronenberg) or directors of popular movies (e.g. James Cameron, John Carpenter, Jonathan Demme, Joseph L. Mankiewicz, John McTiernan, Vincente Minnelli, Robert Mulligan, Roman Polanski, Rob Reiner, Herbert Ross, Franklin J. Schaffner, John Schlesinger, Joel Schumacher, Tony Scott, John Sturges, William Wellman, Billy Wilder, Fred Zinnermann). Then there are those directors whose movies overall raise more questions than answers in terms of great director (Barry Levinson, George Lucas, Sidney Lumet, Wolfgang Petersen, Sydney Pollack, Robert Rodriguez, Quintin Tarantino, Andrei Tarkovsky).
Favorite Directors in alphabetical order (it will take me months to attempt any semblence of an order):
Robert Aldrich Woody Allen Robert Altman Michael Anderson, Sr. Richard Attenborough Bruce Beresford Ingmar Bergman Richard Brooks Tim Burton Frank Capra Charlie Chaplin Francis Ford Coppola George Cukor Cecile B. DeMille Stanley Donen Clint Eastwood Federico Fellini Victor Fleming John Ford Milos Forman John Frankenheimer Terry Gilliam D.W. Griffith Lasse Hallstrom George Roy Hill Alfred Hitchcock Ron Howard John Huston James Ivory Stanley Kubrick Akira Kurosawa Fritz Lang David Lean David Lynch Michael Mann Martin Scorsese Ridley Scott Steven Soderbergh Steven Spielberg Oliver Stone Erich von Stroheim Francois Truffaut Peter Weir Orson Wells Robert Wise William Wyler Zhang Yimou
Posts: 955 | Location: Utah, United States | Registered: 22 July 2005
The only way I could feel comfortable listing my most favorite director's is to base the list on the movies that I liked the most. However, if they only directed one movie, no matter how good, I really couldn't say it was the director, the script, or the actors - the following list is what I hope are those directors whose movies the I enjoyed and who may have had a large role in why I like them (in alphabetic order):
Alfred Hitchcock Stanley Kubrick David Lean David Lynch Michael Mann Ridley Scott Steven Spielberg Peter Weir Robert Wise
Posts: 955 | Location: Utah, United States | Registered: 22 July 2005
Gun to my head, I'd name Brian DePalma as my favorite director. I like directors who tells their stories visually with the camera. And no one does this better than DePalma. Among his impressive oeuvre I'd have to say that my favorites are BLOW OUT, which was the first DePalma movie I caught; BODY DOUBLE, kind of a riff on Hitchcock's VERTIGO; MISSION IMPOSSIBLE, a first-rate popcorn picture; and THE UNTOUCHABLES, the film that made Kevin Costner a star and up to that point DePalma's biggest hit.
Gun to my head, I'd name Brian DePalma as my favorite director. I like directors who tells their stories visually with the camera. And no one does this better than DePalma. Among his impressive oeuvre I'd have to say that my favorites are BLOW OUT, which was the first DePalma movie I caught; BODY DOUBLE, kind of a riff on Hitchcock's VERTIGO; MISSION IMPOSSIBLE, a first-rate popcorn picture; and THE UNTOUCHABLES, the film that made Kevin Costner a star and up to that point DePalma's biggest hit.
When I reviewed my own list of film directors that I considered, De Palma wasn't even on it. In looking over Brian De Palma's filmography and the recognition he has received from the awards industry, I failed to find any significant recognition that he has obtained and in fact he has been nominated as the worst director five times by the Razzie Awards. When I think of visual directors, I am drawn towards Ridley Scott in Black Hawk Down (2001) or even Stanley Kubrick in 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968).
Posts: 955 | Location: Utah, United States | Registered: 22 July 2005
DePalma has made some stinkers, but he's also made some terrific films, and when he's on, he's on. "Blow Out", "Casulties of War", "Carlito's Way", and "Mission Impossible" were all great movies, and 2002's "Femme Fatale" is one of the most underrated films from the past few years, with a visual style that would knock anybody's socks off.
----- Stay gold, Ponyboy. Stay gold.
Posts: 5266 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 19 June 2005
Originally posted by ericg75: DePalma has made some stinkers, but he's also made some terrific films, and when he's on, he's on. "Blow Out", "Casulties of War", "Carlito's Way", and "Mission Impossible" were all great movies, and 2002's "Femme Fatale" is one of the most underrated films from the past few years, with a visual style that would knock anybody's socks off.
Any filmmaker with a body of work as extensive as DePalma's is going to make their share of stinkers. I do agree about FEMME FATALE. I loved that film! In fact, I loved it so much I bought the DVD and watched it again. That opening set piece regarding the robbery at the Cannes Film Festival was some bravura filmmaking.
This was an extremely difficult cut to make, but I've selected five, along with the films I consider masterworks of each director:
1. Billy Wilder (Double Indemnity, Sunset Blvd., Some Like It Hot, and The Apartment) 2. Orson Welles (Citizen Kane, The Magnificent Ambersons, Touch of Evil, and Chimes at Midnight) 3. Alfred Hitchcock (Rebecca, Notorious, Rear Window, North by Northwest, Vertigo, and Psycho) 4. Stanley Kubrick (The Killing, Spartacus, Lolita, Dr. Strangelove, 2001, A Clockwork Orange, and Barry Lyndon) 5. Terry Gilliam (The Holy Grail, Meaning of Life, Brazil, 12 Monkeys, and Fear and Loathing)
Alternates: Fellini, Wes Anderson, Lynch, Ford, Tarantino, Melville, Cronenberg, and The Coen Brothers.
1. Martin Scorsese 2. David Fincher 3. Billy Wilder 4. Joel Coen 5. Michael Mann Honorable Mentions: Alfred Hitchcock, Cameron Crowe, Terry Gilliam, David Cronenberg
Also, Woody Allen and John Carpenter at their better moments
Posts: 159 | Location: http://electriclust.tumblr.com | Registered: 27 July 2006
Based on criteria of originality, risks, vision, final product, consistency.
Jean Luc Godard Richard Linklater Luis Bunuel David Lynch Michelangelo Antonioni
All five filmmakers depend on their visions, significantly their sense of detail. Risk taking is eminent for these filmmakers, who surpass challenges. All five have variety in their works, including the frequently misunderstood Lynch, who attempted and succeeded in his three accessible movies (Elephant Man, Dune, The Straight Story). Their final products have been established with copious details that determine the quality of their films.
Today's selection. It'll change next week. No particular order. Spielberg Welles Dreyer Hitchcock Satyajit Ray Those who knock Spielberg have no idea what they are talking about. His eye is incredible, his spatial construction is superb. Watch the scene in ET when the government first arrive at the family home. Everything is filmed from a child's perspective, carefully, economically and realizing the sense of horror, intimidation and confusion Elliot and the others feel.
'for my purpose holds to sail beyond the sunset, and the baths of all the western stars, until I die.'
Posts: 2155 | Location: The ever silent spaces of the East | Registered: 12 February 2007
Robert Bresson: He had a remarkable sense of tension and release, and I love the fact that he rarely used the same actor twice, mostly working with non-actors, thus allowing the viewer to believe more whole-heartedly in the characterization.
Billy Wilder: For the ability to make slapstick work in films like Kiss me, Stupid, and then turn around and get serious with Double Indemnity and the Apartment.
Terence Malick: His films are not static postcards as so many often critique. Badlands is dynamic as hell and the Thin Red Line takes a single man and makes a universe.
Peter Weir: Because he is yet to make a truly terrible film, and his storytelling instinct is up there w/ Spielberg.
Werner Herzog: If for nothing else, the majesty of Aguirre. But watch a lot of his films, and he always begins at the crisis point, as so few filmmakers do. (for that, also look to Cronenberg)
'for my purpose holds to sail beyond the sunset, and the baths of all the western stars, until I die.'
Posts: 2155 | Location: The ever silent spaces of the East | Registered: 12 February 2007
Jules: Normally, both your asses would be dead as fucking fried chicken, but you happen to pull this shit while I'm in a transitional period so I don't wanna kill you, I wanna help you. But I can't give you this case, it don't belong to me. Besides, I've already been through too much shit this morning over this case to hand it over to your dumb ass.
I can't narrow it to 5. This list is in no particular order...
Godfrey Reggio (Koyaanisqatsi is a masterpiece) David Fincher Ridley Scott Quentin Tarantino (For Dogs and Fiction) Peter Richardson (the 'Comic Strip' films) Bruce Robinson Stanley Kubrick David Cronenberg
There are numerous directors I should mention who blackened their name later in their career. I wish John Carpenter and George A Romero would return to form. Spielberg did some amazing films before he started churning out cliche blockbusters for cash. Sam Raimi too - Evil dead 1 & 2 are hugely enjoyable and Tobe Hooper's chainsaw massacre is incredible (why did he do The Mangler?).