quote:
Originally posted by Duncan Black:
St Anger was a massive let down for me. What are the appealing factors in that record?
Hopefully, the next album can’t get any worse?
quote:
Originally posted by Duncan Black:
I'm a guitarist myself and when you play something like the riff from 'Master of Puppets' in the same way as Metallica (all down strokes), it actually hurts. They really pound the guitars.
Bloody oath. I can’t play Master of Puppets using downstrokes only for very long. I think Kirk has had issues with RSI in the past; it wouldn’t surprise me if both James and Kirk’s wrists are all fucked up.
quote:
Originally posted by Duncan Black:
On St Anger there wasn't the same brutality. It was much more lazy. From the comments on the DVD they said they were trying to recapture the sound of a band forming in a garage and the premise fell short of the mark. This was simply due to the fact that they obviously weren't a band meeting for the first time. If you've got all the latest recording equipment and a shit hot producer - why not use those things? Trying to sound 'lo-fi' seemed a bit futile.
I think some of the riffs on
St. Anger are catchy. I honestly believe that there is always a place for any riff and that any riff can be turned or incorporated into a good, well written song, if the artist is willing to put some time and effort into it. When I listen to
St. Anger, all I hear is a whole lot of squandered opportunity, for example: Potentially catchy riffs overly played out that go nowhere. Second guitarist playing the same played out riffs, instead of adding guitar harmonies. Complete lack of soloing. Etc.
I don’t buy into “
INSERT BAND is dead”. People who say shit like that are fanboys of a different era or genre. Until Metallica are literally dead or physically incapable of writing/performing, nothing is absolute. I wouldn’t stake my life either way, maybe they will make another great album, and maybe they won’t.
Will you deny the ying to your proverbial yang?