Metacritic.com
Film Video/DVD Music Games Books TV
Metacritic    Metacritic Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Books  Hop To Forums  Best & Worst of 2007    Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallow
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Apprentice Guru
Posted Hide Post
It truly is fascinating. After I finished this one I was obsessed with everything harry potter (which is why i posted in here) and read lots of that mugglenet stuff. Also the great wikipedia has a nice run down on each character. Funner, though, is they go into the etymology of the most names. Right down to the meaning of what the wands are made out of. Apparently, yew (which is voldy's wand, sort of Wink ) is traditionally an evil wood. I also found a funny article in the new national geographic all about the different plants in harry potter. Mandrake root (from the 2nd one) actually looks like a shrunken, root-like human.
 
Posts: 456 | Location: On the Road | Registered: 20 January 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Forum Moderator"
Super Bad-Ass Jedi
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by The Friar:
Mandrake root (from the 2nd one) actually looks like a shrunken, root-like human.


Sort of like how they showed it in Pan's Labyrinth.


"Naked Woman, Naked Man
Where did you get that nice sun tan?"
 
Posts: 12874 | Location: Behind the Orange Curtain | Registered: 14 May 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Apprentice Guru
Posted Hide Post
Exactly!!!
doh! (seems appropiate being the day before)
Completely forgot about that mark!
 
Posts: 456 | Location: On the Road | Registered: 20 January 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Jedi
Posted Hide Post
I recently wrote a book review for school on tome 7. Tell me what you think.

quote:
Harry Potter: 1990-2007
Harry Potter, J. K. Rowling’s boy wonder who took the world by storm in 1997, reaches the final climax. The strength of Voldemort has grown, and Potter must now face off with him after taking the ultimate Campbellian hero’s journey, taking the call to adventure when he is scarcely 10 years old, completely unaware of where he would end up. Harry, Ron, and Hermione spend the majority of the book away from Hogwarts searching frantically for Horcruxes, bits of Voldemort’s soul stored in items. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is a roller-coaster ride conclusion to the defining bildungsroman of this generation, which toys with the emotions of the reader, who has grown to care about the characters.
From early on, death plays a large role in the book. Almost immediately, Hedwig and “Mad-Eye” Moody die. Then Harry, Hermione, and Ron begin a search for the Horcruxes. They find Salazar Slytherin’s locket, but as they are unable to open it, they are compelled to carry it around. Ron, frustrated by the fact that Harry is obsessing over magical items known as the Deathly Hallows, deserts Harry and Hermione. Ron returns to Harry’s aid, however, by destroying the locket when it nearly kills Harry. The Horcruxes are destroyed one by one, but in the meantime characters drop like flies. The book culminates in Hogwarts, the place where everything began. The final battle ensuing in Hogwarts claims more than fifty people, with six of these people throughout the books. The book ends with most, if not all, questions answered, and concludes with a powerful, though predictable, ending.
The book is surprisingly weak as a stand-alone book. The characters would be incomprehensible, capricious, and infuriating to someone reading it that had not read the other six. The book is extremely dependent on the other books, which makes it harder to judge it as separate entity rather than as a continuum. Though the books as one book in many volumes are a stunning fantasy endeavor, in general, and specifically in Deathly Hallows, they wander horribly and go on hundred-page tangents. Harry, Ron, and Hermione spend hundreds of pages searching for Horcruxes when the subplot could have been compressed to much less. This has always been a weakness of Rowling’s books – the U.S. printing of Order of the Phoenix is 845 pages long, and Deathly Hallows contains 759 pages. In addition to lack of editing and rambling, she too often utilizes a deus ex machina to save someone from a trying situation. In Deathly Hallows, Neville pulls Godric Gryffindor’s sword out of the Sorting Hat because he is a “true Gryffindor”, but the idea seems too fantastic even for a fantasy novel. The idea behind a fantasy novel is to provide some aspect of magic without being too outlandish, and a few times Rowling oversteps these bounds.
Though the book suffers from being too long and at times too fantastic, it collects masterfully an amazing array of loose threads. If nothing else, it is a testament to Rowling’s ability to keep track of all the subplots occurring during the main plot and being able to tie everything in at the end. She also draws from an impressive array of books and people, taking cues from Joseph Campbell, Sir James Frazer, J.R.R. Tolkien, and many others. Above all, however, the book at its roots is a well-written story that happened to captivate a generation with its immersive universe. Each book has sold at least 50 million copies worldwide, due, according to Sam Leith of the Daily Telegraph, to its “crossover” appeal. Adults and children alike have fallen for the series, which has sold hundreds of millions of copies, surpassing 325 million in 2007, with the number growing daily.
Harry Potter risks becoming an overused, tired franchise: the last two movies are slated to come out in 2008 and 2010, and unless some drastic occurrence prevents it, there are also going to be games and soundtracks for the last two. The LEGO® company is licensed to create Harry Potter sets as well. Sometime in the next few years, a Harry Potter-based theme park is opening on Island of Adventure in Universal Studios. Those who came late to reading Harry Potter have been immersed in Potter-mania since birth – all around them there were and still are an absurd amount of Harry Potter media. Deathly Hallows concludes the epic, but Potter shows promise to live on well past the final book.

WORKS CITED
Leith, Sam. “The Wand is Mightier than the Pen”. Daily Telegraph. 30 June 2007.
Rowling, J.K. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. New York: Scholastic Press, 2007.

By the way, that was three pages on paper! MC sure shrinks the fonts Red Face


☺☻☺☻☺☻☺☻☺☻☺☻☺
Go Liminal State Bobcats!
 
Posts: 1071 | Location: Back, after an eternal hiatus | Registered: 24 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Apprentice Guru
Posted Hide Post
how old are you again sin? i didn't learn about Joseph Campbell and James Frazer til i was 18.

a very well written paper. i hope potter lives on and my kids (that better be pretty far off Red Face) will like it as much as i did. the books, not the movies. i read the vent section of the AJC the other day and a kid told his mother "why read a book, if its that good, they'll make it a movie."

Read the damn books and the harry potter movies wouldn't be so confusing. kids, kids, kids.

though, i gotta say "mad eye" moody didn't die. she explicitly mentions a beggar without an eye when harry, ron and hermione go into diagon alley to do something that i would rather not spoil or change everything to black (i don't have my copy with me sin so i don't know what page).
 
Posts: 456 | Location: On the Road | Registered: 20 January 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Forum Moderator"
Super Bad-Ass Jedi
Posted Hide Post
Finished reading the book yesterday. It was okay though I suppose I expected more or maybe different. The arc involving Snape, which was mentioned earlier, is my favorite part of the novel. I was halfway hoping my favorite minor character would make an appearence though she never did (and it might have distracted from the story had she shown up) but still... And my least favorite character survived- damn!
 
Posts: 8711 | Location: State of Insanity | Registered: 22 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Apprentice Guru
Posted Hide Post
the snape arc was my favorite part of the book too. who is your favorite minor character? and least favorite character?
 
Posts: 456 | Location: On the Road | Registered: 20 January 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Forum Moderator"
Super Bad-Ass Jedi
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by The Friar:
the snape arc was my favorite part of the book too. who is your favorite minor character? and least favorite character?


Favorite minor character is Moaning Myrtle. She's a hoot. Least favorite is Ron Weasley, he always got on my nerves.
 
Posts: 8711 | Location: State of Insanity | Registered: 22 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Forum Moderator"
Super Bad-Ass Jedi
Posted Hide Post
I also liked the Snape arc. Those fine details were great and it was good to know that Dumbledore was always correct in trusting him. It showed that he was a very brave character with a lot more dimension inside of him than Rowling let one.

Some of the things I enjoyed a lot included the chapters “Malfor Manor” and the one after it. It is such a shock going from one extreme to another—from the intense, frantic feel of escaping the manor, to the sad, depressing feel of the next chapter. Rowling did a great job of portraying the characters feelings and emotions.

Often times throughout the book I got a bit choked up and teary-eyed. I guess that one gets attached to these characters and therefore, you feel a certain connection to them. This is especially more poignant with how sad I feel in my present life.


-----
If you don't love me, I'm sorry.
 
Posts: 5866 | Location: Texas | Registered: 27 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Slacker First Class
Posted Hide Post
I thought the book was well-written, for the storyline that she chose. But I didn't like the story.

Honestly, I thought Voldy was supposed to be evil? He reminds me of these typical cartoon villains who keep aiming anvils for the good characters and land under them instead. I was so disappointed. Just because she wants to satisfy fans doesn't mean she needed to sacrifice some realistic stuff like having some of the Golden Trio suffer personal losses (and I mean personal, not like Ron losing his brother. Hermione's muggle-born and leading the Light side with Harry, and she comes out unscathed?? Pfft.).

Oh, and Hermione + Ron? Eeker *pulls her arm off just to have something to thulp Rowling with* I thought her very nature would turn her off to the likes of him. Remus Lupin, perhaps? Wink

Is there a point to the spoilers now? Smiler
 
Posts: 11 | Registered: 23 December 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Participant
Posted Hide Post
I wouldn't say this was my favorite book in the series, but I felt it was a fitting conclusion. A more epic ending would have been great though, it didn't excite me too much.
 
Posts: 32 | Location: California | Registered: 23 December 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2  
 

Metacritic    Metacritic Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Books  Hop To Forums  Best & Worst of 2007    Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallow

©2006 CNET Networks Inc. All rights reserved.
 
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | BOOKS | TV | About Metacritic metacritic.com