Metacritic.com
Film Video/DVD Music Games Books TV
Metacritic    Metacritic Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Music  Hop To Forums  Indie Rock    Arcade Fire - Neon Bible
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
"Forum Moderator"
Super Bad-Ass Jedi
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ezkcdude:
Sorry to be a party pooper, but Neon Bible is not that good. It just isn't it. If you loved Funeral, you will probably just like NB. If you liked Funeral, you will probably think NB is nothing special.


I disagree ezkcdude. I thought Funeral was just okay, but I'm enjoying Neon Bible a lot. The songs on Neon Bible have a real timeless quality Funeral lacked.

The only thing I'm not crazy about is the first minute and a half of "Black Wave/Bad Vibrations". Not bad, but it sounds out of place.

My favorite tracks are "Intervention" and "(Antichrist Television Blues)".


-----
I’ll be Ben Gazzara, you’ll be Gena Rowlands.

 
Posts: 5159 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 19 June 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Know-It-All
Posted Hide Post
I think the emotional impact of Funeral depended a lot on your tolerance for the melodramatic. Myself? I liked the tunes, was a bit disappointed lyrically (and there were a few questionable disco break outs that should have been given the axe), although I spun the album quite a bit when it came out...haven't had any desire to listen since.

Listening to Neon Bible actually makes me yearn for the frostbitten melodrama of the first record. I think this one misses the mark.
 
Posts: 263 | Registered: 24 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Forum Moderator"
Super Bad-Ass Jedi
Posted Hide Post
Anyone want to speculate on the Pitchfork score for this? I'm guessing at least a 9.0. I'll say 9.4.


-----
I’ll be Ben Gazzara, you’ll be Gena Rowlands.

 
Posts: 5159 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 19 June 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Guru
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ericg75:
Anyone want to speculate on the Pitchfork score for this? I'm guessing at least a 9.0. I'll say 9.4.


7.9
 
Posts: 848 | Location: Ain'T it stiLl obvious? | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Forum Moderator"
Super Bad-Ass Jedi
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ezkcdude:
quote:
Originally posted by ericg75:
Anyone want to speculate on the Pitchfork score for this? I'm guessing at least a 9.0. I'll say 9.4.


7.9


Seeing as how they pimp the band just about every day on their site, I can't see them giving it anything lower than like an 8.7.


-----
I’ll be Ben Gazzara, you’ll be Gena Rowlands.

 
Posts: 5159 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 19 June 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Guru
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ericg75:
quote:
Originally posted by ezkcdude:
quote:
Originally posted by ericg75:
Anyone want to speculate on the Pitchfork score for this? I'm guessing at least a 9.0. I'll say 9.4.


7.9


Seeing as how they pimp the band just about every day on their site, I can't see them giving it anything lower than like an 8.7.


True, "they" are pimps. False, "them" don't give reviews. One person does.
 
Posts: 848 | Location: Ain'T it stiLl obvious? | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Enthusiast
Posted Hide Post
They'll get at least 9 from Pitchfork. And they deserve it. Might be the album of the year for me.
 
Posts: 90 | Registered: 17 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Enthusiast
Posted Hide Post
In talking about something else Arcade Fire earlier this month, they referred to the album being "sublime." There is no way it's getting lower than a 9. Ones opinion of the album might differ, but Pfork loves it...I can already tell. It certainly not going to get the 9.7 (Is that right?) that Funeral got, but Funeral didn't really deserve that either...
 
Posts: 132 | Location: DC | Registered: 05 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Enthusiast
Posted Hide Post
I remember a really bizzare pitchfork review: Rooty by Basement Jaxx. It got 3.8 and then i saw it on the list of the best albums from 2000-04(somewhere in the top 50).
 
Posts: 90 | Registered: 17 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Jedi
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I remember a really bizzare pitchfork review: Rooty by Basement Jaxx. It got 3.8 and then i saw it on the list of the best albums from 2000-04(somewhere in the top 50).
The bottom 50 of that list was very odd, I thought. They had that Erlend Øye album that I've heard literally nothing about since, and also had the not-so-great Annie's debut (what was up with their fixation with Annie?) Seems really weird to give Rooty a 3.8 and then stick it at #65 on the top albums of half of a decade.
 
Posts: 1376 | Location: Valparaiso, IN | Registered: 01 July 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Forum Moderator"
Super Bad-Ass Jedi
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by less_success:
and also had the not-so-great Annie's debut (what was up with their fixation with Annie?)


Yeah, I never got the Annie fixation either. I think they were hoping she'd be some big crossover sensation like Kylie Minogue or Kelly Clarkson.


-----
I’ll be Ben Gazzara, you’ll be Gena Rowlands.

 
Posts: 5159 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 19 June 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Jedi
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ericg75:
quote:
Originally posted by less_success:
and also had the not-so-great Annie's debut (what was up with their fixation with Annie?)


Yeah, I never got the Annie fixation either. I think they were hoping she'd be some big crossover sensation like Kylie Minogue or Kelly Clarkson.


I guess they took her on as a pet project.

However, "Heartbeat" is probably one of the best pop songs of the decade, I'll back them up there.


------
Let's raise a toast to St. Joe Strummer! I do believe he was our only decent teacher
 
Posts: 2060 | Location: ATL-abouts. | Registered: 24 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Know-It-All
Posted Hide Post
Subtract about 2 or 3 padding points from Pfork and you will get the actual score...so 7.9 is probably closer to what it really deserves. Do you find any part of this album surprising or innovative?
 
Posts: 263 | Registered: 24 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Forum Moderator"
Super Bad-Ass Jedi
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by CouldBAnyone:
Do you find any part of this album surprising or innovative?


It's surprisingly good.


-----
I’ll be Ben Gazzara, you’ll be Gena Rowlands.

 
Posts: 5159 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 19 June 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Jedi
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ericg75:
quote:
Originally posted by CouldBAnyone:
Do you find any part of this album surprising or innovative?


It's surprisingly good.


Not for me Smiler

To CouldBAnyone: It's just damn good. It sounds like little else out there, and that's something hard to find. I can't say there was anything surprising or innovative - Menomena, perhaps, is more of both of those - but Neon Bible is the best album I've heard so far this year.


------
Let's raise a toast to St. Joe Strummer! I do believe he was our only decent teacher
 
Posts: 2060 | Location: ATL-abouts. | Registered: 24 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Guru
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Johnsofats:
In talking about something else Arcade Fire earlier this month, they referred to the album being "sublime." There is no way it's getting lower than a 9. Ones opinion of the album might differ, but Pfork loves it...I can already tell. It certainly not going to get the 9.7 (Is that right?) that Funeral got, but Funeral didn't really deserve that either...


Hmmm...They only gave "Intervention" 3 stars in a track review.
 
Posts: 848 | Location: Ain'T it stiLl obvious? | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
SDF
Apprentice Guru
Posted Hide Post
I predict it will score in the high 7's to low 8's, enough to be "recommended," but too low for "Best New Music." The fact is, they can no longer take ownership of their popularity, so they have no incentive to promote them any further. Besides, they usually reserve the really high scores for bands that they've never given that tag to before.
 
Posts: 380 | Registered: 11 January 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Apprentice Guru
Posted Hide Post
Yeah, I don't really care what PF rates it, but I'd give it a 9 or so, myself. Really love this album.
 
Posts: 431 | Registered: 11 October 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Slacker
Posted Hide Post
Just when I thought this album might be the one met with as little criticism as possible, it is going to suffer from people who in my opinion just don't want to get it even if they liked Funeral. Neon Bible is a massive accomplishment for the Arcade Fire and to me it even surpasses Funeral.
 
Posts: 5 | Location: Buffalo, New York | Registered: 11 February 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Jedi
Posted Hide Post
I think Pitchfork goes 9+ with this as well. Along with Animal Collective and Radiohead, they're now one of the most important indie-rock bands of the decade.
 
Posts: 1315 | Location: Atlanta, GA | Registered: 24 December 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  
 

Metacritic    Metacritic Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Music  Hop To Forums  Indie Rock    Arcade Fire - Neon Bible

©2006 CNET Networks Inc. All rights reserved.
 
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | BOOKS | TV | About Metacritic metacritic.com