I don't know why Metacritic hasn't summarized the 2007 top 10s like they did in prior years. Here's a summary I prepared based on results published here as of 1/12/2008:
12:08 East of Bucharest - 1*,7
13 Lakes and Ten Skies - 3
28 Weeks Later... - 7
4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days - 1*,1*,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6,8,9
A Mighty Heart - 4,10
Absolute Wilson - 1*
Across the Universe - 1*,7,7,9
Adam's Apple - 1*
After the Wedding - 4
All This in Tea - 3
American Gangster - 2,5,6,7,8
American Hardcore - 8
An Unreasonable Man - 9
Anything with Philip Seymour Hoffman - 10
Assassination of Jesse James - 1*,1*,3,3,4,4,5,5,5,8,9,9,9,10
For what it is worth, when critics included ties that increased the number of movies in their list, I re-numbered their lists to account for ties. For example, if a critic had two movies tied for #1, I pushed their #2 movie(s) back to #3 and so on. Only each critic's highest 10 movies are included (except in case of for ties for 10th).
This message has been edited. Last edited by: Thomas K,
Posts: 2 | Location: Seattle | Registered: 12 January 2008
Well it seems like No Country for Old Men and There Will Be Blood tied with the highest number of 1st placement votes unsurprisingly. I'm glad Zodiac appeared on so many lists since I thought it might get overlooked because it came out during the beginning of the year.
"It's become so obvious, you are so oblivious to yourself"
I really appreciate what you have done here Thomas, but a given title of a film or book does not begin with 'The'.
There I was hunting for Bourne Ultimatum, The and shocked it wasn't there.....oh, there it is. naughty, naughty.
Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta: the tip of the tongue taking a trip of three steps down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Lo. Lee. Ta.
Posts: 2759 | Location: The ever silent spaces of the East | Registered: 12 February 2007