I think we had something similar to this last year where people would post albums they do mind seeing at a #1 slot and in turn albums that they don't mind seeing at #1 slots on lists--then they would state why they feel this way. I thought it be a good idea to do this again for 2006 albums and it would create some interesting conversations.
----- Never say you miss her, never say a word. And do everything she'd never do.
Posts: 6632 | Location: Texas | Registered: 27 December 2005
'Sno Angel Like You - Howe Gelb The Knife - Silent Shout Beirut - Gulag Orkestra Destroyer's Rubies Black Cadillac - Rosanne Cash Boys and Girls in America - Hold Steady Donuts - J. Dilla Fishscale - Ghostface Killah Modern Times - Bob Dylan Ys - Joanna Newsome Orphans - Tom Waits Drums Not Dead - Liars The Drift - Scott Walker Fox Confessor Brings the Flood - Neko Case Return to the Sea - Islands Bang Bang Rock and Roll - Art Brut Seeger Sessions - Bruce Springsteen IANAOYAIWBYA - Yo La Tengo The Greatest - Cat Power Wolfmother Scale - Herbert Savanne - Ali Farka Toure Pink - Boris
Do Mind
Whatever People Say I am - Arctic Monkeys The Body, The Blood, The Machine - Thermals Return to Cookie Mountain - TV on the Radio Broken Boy Soldier - Raconteurs St. Elsewhere - Gnarls Barkley Living With War - Neil Young The Life Pursuit - B&S Everything All the Time - Band of Horses Show Your Bones - The Yeah Yeah Yeahs The Eraser - Thom Yorke Food and Liquor - Lupe Fiasco
Bottom Line -
There's a lot of titles in the Do Mind category I personally like better than some in the Don't Mind Category...but I do believe all the titles in my Don't Mind Category were singular releases - either top two in their sub-genre, or simply unique...
My Do Mind Category is filled with albums for which I feel superior albums in same genre were released this year, or which I simply feel are so far from great it's silly they are being mentioned.
I have to say that so far, the extensive love for Arctic Monkeys, Raconteurs, and Gnarls Barkley in particular has surprised me because I always hope critics can distinguish between an album and a single which clearly we are seeing, they cannot.
Can't give a lot of love to TV on the Radio either...I really like it, but it's got so many flaws and structually flat moments, it just isn't number one material when albums like 'Sno Angel, Silent Shout, or Boys & Girls that nail virtually every moment are out there. Haven't seen much of The Thermals on the top ten lists so far, but I am in the majority that thinks this is perfectly just...the music is consistently good, but never great, and the fascist religious right meets soylent green story line is more silly than provocative to me, and I'm an obsessive SF fan.
TV On the Radio - Return to Cookie Mountain. Whether you like it or not, it is original. It has pop hooks (Wolf Like Me, Province, A Method) and it rocks in equal measure.
The Hold Steady - Boys and Girls in America. Like Gnarls, this has the ability to appeal to the hipsters and the popsters. It's cool even though it shouldn't be.
Joanna Newsom - Ys. Let's be honest, no one's making music with this orchestration. Sure some people drop the strings, chellos, timpanis, etc., but for the most part it's just to add some heft to the music. Van Dyke has done a wonderful job. He's bringing classic-back, them other brothers don't know where it's at
Do Mind:
Bob Dylan - Modern Times. I love Dylan, don't get me wrong, but he's been coasting on cred for a long time now. Sure, you may think this album is interesting, but it's hardly spectacular.
Band of Horses - Everything All the Time. Hey, I like this album a lot. But I also like Shins and MMJ better, and both bands do a better job than Band of Horses. It's too similar to its influences.
Lupe Fiasco - Food & Liquor. "Hey that Kanye album was pretty big, why don't I make one just like it?!"
Ali Farka Toure - Savane. Yeah, I get it, he's a talented guy and this is/was his swan song. It seems like people call it great because they feel obligated. Do you really think his guitar sounds that good? Pls explain. Plus the album hardly varies from song to song.
Posts: 755 | Location: Nova Scotia | Registered: 31 May 2006
In all honesty, the Hold Steady album is great, fantastic even, but I think something needs to be really special/different to be a #1. The Hold Steady aren't doing anything new, they're just making damn good music. Meanwhile, TV on the Radio, regardless of whatever hiccups it may have in the middle of the record, is original, surprising, and in my opinion plumbs much further depths in terms of modern music.
------ Aren't there any girls out their who like good music? I need to and want to meet them. My favorite bands are Overkill River, The Nife, Songs:Ohio, and Nuetral Milk Hotel. Please let me know if your into indy music and like to go to show's and drink beer's and makeout.
Posts: 2706 | Location: ATL-abouts. | Registered: 24 October 2006
Originally posted by Chamberk: In all honesty, the Hold Steady album is great, fantastic even, but I think something needs to be really special/different to be a #1. The Hold Steady aren't doing anything new, they're just making damn good music.
I'd definitely say the Hold Steady are doing something special. While I wouldn't say they're doing something 100% original, certainly they're doing something that nobody else is doing in rock in 2006. Let's face it, if you heard a brand new Hold Steady song, you're certainly not going to mistake it for the work of another artist. I'm not sure how many other bands (even ones on my top 20 list) I could say that about.
----- Use all your well-learned politesse or I'll lay your soul to waste.
Posts: 5923 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 19 June 2005
The only album I truly do mind is Ys by Joanna Newsom. I'm not going to get into why again, because I've already explained it like three times in the "Best of 2006" discussion.
Il n'y a pas de hors-texte.
Posts: 3139 | Location: FoCo | Registered: 07 January 2005
I don't mind any album at #1 on year-end lists. Why would or should anyone mind? If an album gives someone joy, more power to them.
I do mind if people who claim they love music can't pick a few albums to enjoy this year or any year. I'd rather hear them praise an album I may not like than hear them whine whine whine that they can't find new music to like. Guess they don't like music as much as they claim.
Posts: 9853 | Location: State of Insanity | Registered: 22 September 2005
Originally posted by crazed: I don't mind any album at #1 on year-end lists. Why would or should anyone mind? If an album gives someone joy, more power to them.
I do mind if people who claim they love music can't pick a few albums to enjoy this year or any year. I'd rather hear them praise an album I may not like than hear them whine whine whine that they can't find new music to like. Guess they don't like music as much as they claim.
Well said, crazed. I had written something similar to this, but a little saucier, and not quite as coherent. I erased it. I don't see much changing around the forums; a few people would rather bitch and moan about Band So-and-so than actually find and enjoy new music. A little disagreement is fine, and the quick, good-natured quips (PRG) are OK (and tired! get new material!)…but these lengthy posts and threads on how much people dislike certain bands are pretty ri-goddamn-diculous.
I've said it before: everybody here is pretty similar when it comes to taste in music. A few people will have "out there" top 20s—pE likes power-pop, RL and modestryan like lap-pop, LT likes jazz, crazed owns every album ever recorded—but really, for the most part, we all listen to the same shit. Why some people resort to belittling other folks' tastes I can only assume is to desperately stake claim, loudly, to a modicum of individuality.
That is all.
Oh, and indie rock sucks.
Posts: 1652 | Location: Philadelphia, PA | Registered: 15 September 2004
No worries, good points made. I just answered what the thread was asking...but yeah, when you put it that way. Hey, I like people having their own tastes, but wouldn't we all be a little disappointed or shocked if such-and-such an album was #1 by consensus?
You're right though, there's no point in criticizing someone's taste as a means of promoting my own. Sure, I have the best taste in music, but I don't need to go rubbing it in.
Posts: 755 | Location: Nova Scotia | Registered: 31 May 2006
wouldn't we all be a little disappointed or shocked if such-and-such an album was #1 by consensus?
You shouldn't be; it's been made #1 by consensus. Obviously enough people included it to make it so. I'm shocked The Hold Steady (my own #1) is in position to win, personally, because it's not as uniting across indie circles as a Sufjan or a TV on the Radio, both of whom are more defined by their musical style than their lyrical narrative.
Posts: 1652 | Location: Philadelphia, PA | Registered: 15 September 2004
wouldn't we all be a little disappointed or shocked if such-and-such an album was #1 by consensus?
You shouldn't be; it's been made #1 by consensus. Obviously enough people included it to make it so.
I know Leland, but wouldn't you be disappointed if the metacritic forum "family" voted Fergie as the #1 album of the year? Sure, lots of actual people might even believe that, but come on, don't you think you might be a little shocked/saddened? You are right however, that it's wrong to criticize people for their tastes in art, it's subjective and we all like what we like.
If someone tells me that MacDonalds was their favorite food, who am I to tell them they're an idiot...I just have to keep that thought to myself.... but if MacDonalds was voted "best food in the world", I'd be disappointed/shocked/saddened. *single tear rolling down my cheek*
Posts: 755 | Location: Nova Scotia | Registered: 31 May 2006
Originally posted by Musicalifragilistic: I know Leland, but wouldn't you be disappointed if the metacritic forum "family" voted Fergie as the #1 album of the year?
That would be Fergalicious.
----- Use all your well-learned politesse or I'll lay your soul to waste.
Posts: 5923 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 19 June 2005
wouldn't we all be a little disappointed or shocked if such-and-such an album was #1 by consensus?
You shouldn't be; it's been made #1 by consensus. Obviously enough people included it to make it so.
I know Leland, but wouldn't you be disappointed if the metacritic forum "family" voted Fergie as the #1 album of the year? Sure, lots of actual people might even believe that, but come on, don't you think you might be a little shocked/saddened? You are right however, that it's wrong to criticize people for their tastes in art, it's subjective and we all like what we like.
If someone tells me that MacDonalds was their favorite food, who am I to tell them they're an idiot...I just have to keep that thought to myself.... but if MacDonalds was voted "best food in the world", I'd be disappointed/shocked/saddened. *single tear rolling down my cheek*
And if Fergie made #1 you'd find a new forum to read, in much the same way you moved away from Rolling Stone when you realized how horribly out of touch they were. You'll seek and find inclusion elsewhere.
Posts: 1652 | Location: Philadelphia, PA | Registered: 15 September 2004
Originally posted by m.leland: And if Fergie made #1 you'd find a new forum to read, in much the same way you moved away from Rolling Stone when you realized how horribly out of touch they were. You'll seek and find inclusion elsewhere.
For all the RS dissing around here, their Top 10 list was actually pretty good. RHCP at #2 was a little generous, but the rest was full of pretty good albums.
----- Use all your well-learned politesse or I'll lay your soul to waste.
Posts: 5923 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 19 June 2005
Originally posted by m.leland: And if Fergie made #1 you'd find a new forum to read, in much the same way you moved away from Rolling Stone when you realized how horribly out of touch they were. You'll seek and find inclusion elsewhere.
For all the RS dissing around here, their Top 10 list was actually pretty good. RHCP at #2 was a little generous, but the rest was full of pretty good albums.
Yeah, pretty surprising. But a single list can't erase an entire year's worth of vacuous reporting.
Posts: 1652 | Location: Philadelphia, PA | Registered: 15 September 2004
Originally posted by m.leland: And if Fergie made #1 you'd find a new forum to read, in much the same way you moved away from Rolling Stone when you realized how horribly out of touch they were. You'll seek and find inclusion elsewhere.
Haha, you've got me pegged. I subscribed to Rollingstone for about 4 or 5 years, before I knew how bad they sucked. I used to think Peter Travers was the most "right on" movie critic of all time. No more RS for me, not for about 5 years now.
Yeah, I used to subscribe to Maxim magazine as well, when it first came out...man I was lame...probably still am, and I'll only realise it in two or three years, looking back. Maybe I am doomed to be lame all of my life, only realising a couple years, after the fact, that I was oh so wrong. Live and learn, I guess.
Posts: 755 | Location: Nova Scotia | Registered: 31 May 2006
I'm with leland on this whole topic. I prefer not to belittle anybody's lists, whatever my motivation. If a majority of people put Fergie or any other stinker at the top of their lists, so be it. Do I agree? No. Do I care? No. I'll just seek out the opinions of people who share my tastes (which is why I'm here).
quote:
Originally posted by Platypus Quest: I'd have to give a big "no thanks" to The Decemberists and Band of Horses at the top. Gross.
However, I would be ecstatic to see Joanna Newsom and Subtle at or very close to the top. That would be most excellent!!
Of course, The Decemberists are at the top of my list, and Joanna Newsom makes me convulse every time I hear her.
So there.
Posts: 134 | Location: here | Registered: 31 July 2006