The list will be top 20 albums. There are two options on the method for compiling composite scores:
1. 30-25-20-17-16-15-14...down to 1 point for your 20th ranked album.
2. You assign scores however you please, with a total of 200 points to divide between albums.
Advantage of #1: simpler
Advantage of #2: more accurate
Anyone with 20 or more posts can vote on this. Just put a simple 1 or 2. I'll give people 2 weeks to vote, which means until November 9th. Whichever gets the most votes we'll go with.
Posts: 3877 | Location: NE Indiana | Registered: 14 April 2005
I think we should go for the (significantly) simpler option. I think the more complex one might put off some people from even making a list, and a larger sample size is always nice if we're looking for a 'consensus' vote.
Posts: 570 | Location: Boston | Registered: 17 May 2004
but, because that is a lot of work for people, I think we should have a default score for each rank if you don't feel like scoring them yourself. Does the total points in version 1 add up to 200?
What's the deal with the #1 score being 30? Is that to total 200 points?
The main thing that worries me about option #2 is that someone could assign their favorite record (say, Paris Hilton's) 181 points and each of their remaining favorites (2-20) 1 point each, really skewing the list. I appreciate that option 2 gives people the option to REALLY love their favorites (I'd give 50 out of 200 for the Hold Steady, easy) but it also may make the scoring really exaggerated.
This message has been edited. Last edited by: philosopherEric,
Posts: 3875 | Location: ATL, GA | Registered: 25 May 2004
The main thing that worries me about option #2 is that someone could assign their favorite record (say, Paris Hilton's) 181 points and each of their remaining favorites (2-20) 1 point each, really skewing the list.
My plans are ruined! RUINED!
Posts: 1652 | Location: Philadelphia, PA | Registered: 15 September 2004
Originally posted by philosopherEric: The main thing that worries me about option #2 is that someone could assign their favorite record (say, Paris Hilton's) 181 points and each of their remaining favorites (2-20) 1 point each, really skewing the list. I appreciate that option 2 gives people the option to REALLY love their favorites (I'd give 50 out of 200 for the Hold Steady, easy) but it also may make the scoring really exaggerated.
I agree with pE on this one. I feel like option 2 is probably a better option as well but the scoring could really become unfair. So I guess my vote is for option 1
----- I got a stone where my heart should be.
Posts: 5716 | Location: Texas | Registered: 27 December 2005
What's the deal with the #1 score being 30? Is that to total 200 points?
I made the top 3 worth more than simply 20-19-18 because I figure there's more likely to be a big gap between one's top few albums than a few in the middle of end of one's list. For some people that will maybe less accurate than a straight 20-19-18 list, but I think overall it presents a more accurate picture.
Posts: 3877 | Location: NE Indiana | Registered: 14 April 2005
#1 but for my money it should be 20,19,18 etc. There isn't 13 points-worth between a 1st and a 4th, IMO.
actually, IMO it should just be a top 10. There'll be LOTS of entries, 10 is plenty, there'll still be plenty of albums nominated in total to give an overall forum top 20 (top 50 even, probably).
Originally posted by Tru Blu: #1 but for my money it should be 20,19,18 etc. There isn't 13 points-worth between a 1st and a 4th, IMO.
actually, IMO it should just be a top 10. There'll be LOTS of entries, 10 is plenty, there'll still be plenty of albums nominated in total to give an overall forum top 20 (top 50 even, probably).
I think RL's thinking was that most people like their top 3 a whole lot more than anything else, so they should carry more weight. I'd say that's probably true in most cases.
As for the top 20 thing, I think most people can easily do a top 20. As with last year, I think you can do a top 10 if you want and only the points for those will be recorded.
----- I’ll be Ben Gazzara, you’ll be Gena Rowlands.
Posts: 5183 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 19 June 2005