Metacritic.com
Film Video/DVD Music Games Books TV
Metacritic    Metacritic Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Games  Hop To Forums  PS3 & PS2 Games    Killzone vs. Halo
Page 1 2 3 4 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Slacker First Class
Posted Hide Post
I like to play with a game controller instead of a Mouse and Keyboard. Its all about what you like.
 
Posts: 16 | Location: The Great White North (Canada) | Registered: 25 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Participant
Posted Hide Post
That's just it. It really isn't about what you like. The only reason people like controllers for games like halo and KZ are because they throttle your turn speed and do not allow for acceleration. I guarantee if you tried to walk into rocket arena with a controller you'd be dead before you even managed to turn around. Controllers simply aren't fast enough, period.
 
Posts: 36 | Registered: 05 February 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Participant
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I'd like to see a duel between both types of gamers on the same game.

Yes, only make that game a real FPS, like ut or quake or cs... and make sure they don't limit mouse turn speed. They'd also have to enable acceleration.

I sometimes think the new generation of gamers don't really understand how insanely fast an FPS is supposed to be. I like Halo ok I guess, but it is a REALLY dumbed down version of FPSing.
 
Posts: 36 | Registered: 05 February 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Participant
Posted Hide Post
True, true...FPS's on PC's have always been lighting quick. Though having just played Halo2 online w/ 16 other people....it's almost as fast.
 
Posts: 43 | Registered: 13 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Upwardly Mobile Participant
Posted Hide Post
everyone here that thinks killzone is better then halo is crazy..well mabey the first one but the 3ed one theres no way in h*ll thats going to happened in this life time halo 3 is way better the all kill zone games out there right now
 
Posts: 61 | Location: Barrie On. | Registered: 11 December 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Slacker
Posted Hide Post
both games were fun but Halo really, changed my view on wut a FPS should be...
 
Posts: 3 | Registered: 30 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Enthusiast
Posted Hide Post
yea Halo series opened doors in the fps family, Killzones a good game but Halo is just more appealing
 
Posts: 88 | Location: over the medows and through the woods... | Registered: 24 January 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Participant
Posted Hide Post
speaking of which, has the new killzone game for ps3 come out yet?
 
Posts: 43 | Registered: 13 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Slacker
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by xXxGabexXx:
Yeah... Killzone was much better than Halo/Halo 2 even though:

- the game consistently got worse reviews than Halo
- multiplayer was better in Halo
- framerate was better in Halo
- maps were larger in Halo
- graphic effects were better (considering framerate) in Halo
- singleplayer was much better in Halo
- you can ride vehicles in Halo
- the online services are much more complete in Halo

Oh, wait... I change my position. Halo/Halo 2 WAS much better than Killzone.




Man you obviously havent played killzone single player. kicks halos ass so bad .
 
Posts: 2 | Registered: 25 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Slacker
Posted Hide Post
I will agree that the first KillZone wasn't graphically better. But the online game play is completely different. I liked the KZ online play better than Halo 2. In fact H2 copied KZ's "levels" idea.

Now KillZone: Liberation I see is a redemption for their graphics. The game is AWESOME!

Now KillZone 2 is looking 3 times as good as Halo ever will be. Seriously H1 was the first engine build but 2 and 3 used the same engine between each other. Bungie didn't want to create a new graphic engine for Halo 3 seeing how "They never finished the fight."

H2's story line had the worst cliff-hanger ever. And playing with the EMO arbiter was a dumb idea. "Oh lets give him the ****iest weapons and armor ever! We will put him with the stealth team and see how he does." Seriously idiotic. If they really wanted to win that war they wouldn't even do that to a single soldier. Its more flawed than kingdom paradise's story.

Halo is way over rated but KZ1 got the rating it deserved for the graphics bit. Everything else with KillZone was awesome. Sorry but KZ2 has so much going on in the background that it would take 3 halo 2 engines to run the game.


Heroes get remembered,
but Legends never die.
 
Posts: 4 | Location: Albuquerque | Registered: 13 May 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4  
 

Metacritic    Metacritic Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Games  Hop To Forums  PS3 & PS2 Games    Killzone vs. Halo

©2006 CNET Networks Inc. All rights reserved.
 
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | BOOKS | TV | About Metacritic metacritic.com