Metacritic.com
Film Video/DVD Music Games Books TV
Metacritic    Metacritic Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Music  Hop To Forums  Rock    Should the Stones go Away?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Jedi
Posted

Question:
The half-time show at the Super Bowl was embarrassing. Mick sounded awful and I think I could see the marionette strings coming off of Keith's body. I can't believe these guys are still touring and selling out stadiums. Personally, I think it's time to say "Thanks for the memories" and move on. Comments?

Choices:
Yes!!!
Umm, Let me think.......Yes!!!
No

 
 
Posts: 1205 | Location: Hunting in the Korengal | Registered: 04 January 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Participant
Posted Hide Post
The half time show was embarrassing ..yes. The new single is a rip off of themselves...yes. Still, Mick is just a business man these days...and that gig was big business for them.

My (hopeless) hope is that someday the boys will return to their blues roots and put aside the rock posturing which is just silly for a sixty-year old. I could see them putting on a hell of a blues set or two, if they really got into it. And THAT is a Stones show i would pay money to see.

On a postive note, hopefully Bono was watching and learned a lesson from all this...and we won't see U2 playing Superbowl LX.

D


David Archambault
Exeter
Vinyl Nirvana website
 
Posts: 27 | Location: NH | Registered: 28 January 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Forum Moderator"
Super Bad-Ass Jedi
Posted Hide Post
I've been saying that for 30 years, but if they went away today, they'd come back next week in a "Reunion Tour".


"Naked Woman, Naked Man
Where did you get that nice sun tan?"
 
Posts: 12874 | Location: Behind the Orange Curtain | Registered: 14 May 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Forum Moderator"
Jedi
Posted Hide Post
It's none of my business if they should go away. I found the Super Bowl performance to be bloody awful, but I can't begrudge them their opportunity to make money. If people are willing to pay $360 for a ticket, who am I to complain? But, honestly, the Stones haven't really been relevant for over 30 years and you would have to pay ME to sit through their shows.
 
Posts: 3875 | Location: ATL, GA | Registered: 25 May 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Jedi
Posted Hide Post
The Superbowl performance sucked, but when I saw them a couple weeks ago they were great.
 
Posts: 1783 | Location: Around Boston. | Registered: 24 February 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Apprentice Guru
Posted Hide Post
Their last album was garbage, and last night it sounded like Mick couldn't catch his breath. It was awful, although I thought the guitars were pretty solid. Today some of the sports bobbleheads were talking about it like it was the best experience of their lives, but I think that if you rub your eyes and stop being blinded by the name, you realize that they were not good. I would have rather seen a Motown mashup with Smokey and Stevie Wonder (though the anthem by Aretha and Aaron Neville was plain bad).

I guess there's worse bands that people spend hundreds of dollars to see (the Eagles). They've had their differences in the past, and it's commendable that they can stick together long enough to make tens of millions of dollars a year well into their 60s. Time to hang it up.
 
Posts: 364 | Registered: 04 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Know-It-All
Posted Hide Post
Yes, go away. Please.
 
Posts: 166 | Registered: 09 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Forum Moderator"
Super Bad-Ass Jedi
Posted Hide Post
Well, considering the numerous atrocities committed in the name of Super Bowl halftime shows, I don't think the Stones were that bad. Yeah, Mick doesn't sound like he did 35 years ago, but you really can't expect that.


-----
I’ll be Ben Gazzara, you’ll be Gena Rowlands.

 
Posts: 5151 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 19 June 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Apprentice Guru
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ericg75:
Well, considering the numerous atrocities committed in the name of Super Bowl halftime shows, I don't think the Stones were that bad. Yeah, Mick doesn't sound like he did 35 years ago, but you really can't expect that.


Good point...though I don't recall the Britney/Aerosmith collaboration being quite so anticipated. You're right though, they usually suck (exception, U2 in 2002).
 
Posts: 364 | Registered: 04 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Jedi
Posted Hide Post
I have been waiting for Roger Waters to rejoin the 'Floyd for years. At the same time, Detroit Lions fans have been waiting for Barry Sanders to return to football. Some things are better left in the past. Floyd is past the point where they could contribute anything to their legacy and therefore, better off left alone, and Barry is past the point where he could be a factor. I honestly believe that the more time that goes by, the more ridiculous both reunions would be. Now, let's suppose both Barry and Roger select the year 2025 to return from their respective hiatuses. They would probably perform slightly better than Mick and Co. did on Sunday night.
 
Posts: 1205 | Location: Hunting in the Korengal | Registered: 04 January 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Guru
Posted Hide Post
They stunk up the Super Bowl almost as bad as the refs! Time to retire or at least try to fade away tastefully.


"If it were beneficial, their father would produce children already circumcised from their mother. Rather, the true circumcision in spirit has become profitable in every respect." -Jesus, from the Gospel Of Thomas
 
Posts: 730 | Location: Vancouver, B.C. | Registered: 19 May 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Jedi
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bobthespirit:
The Superbowl performance sucked, but when I saw them a couple weeks ago they were great.


My thoughts exactly. I saw them a couple years ago and it was a great show. I think at this point in their career, you have to catch them on a "good night" to make it worth the money. Luckily, the couple times I have seen them have been good nights. Cool


-----------------------
It's been emotional.
 
Posts: 3128 | Location: FoCo | Registered: 07 January 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Guru
Posted Hide Post
Anyone else think the White Stripes should have been at halftime instead of the Stones? Jack and Meg are from Detriot after all, and it would have been funny to see all those 50-something sportswriters scratching their heads wondering, who the hell are these weirdos?
 
Posts: 778 | Registered: 19 February 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Forum Moderator"
Super Bad-Ass Jedi
Posted Hide Post
I don't pay attention to either the Stones or the Super Bowl. If they both went away, I probably wouldn't notice.
 
Posts: 8456 | Location: State of Insanity | Registered: 22 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Forum Moderator"
Super Bad-Ass Jedi
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by paxsoprano:
Anyone else think the White Stripes should have been at halftime instead of the Stones? Jack and Meg are from Detriot after all, and it would have been funny to see all those 50-something sportswriters scratching their heads wondering, who the hell are these weirdos?


That would've been the best Super Bowl half time show ever.


-----
I’ll be Ben Gazzara, you’ll be Gena Rowlands.

 
Posts: 5151 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 19 June 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Apprentice Guru
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ericg75:
quote:
Originally posted by paxsoprano:
Anyone else think the White Stripes should have been at halftime instead of the Stones? Jack and Meg are from Detriot after all, and it would have been funny to see all those 50-something sportswriters scratching their heads wondering, who the hell are these weirdos?


That would've been the best Super Bowl half time show ever.


If snobs ruled the world....

That'd be sick. I don't know if anyone else read Klosterman's week-long blog on espn.com, but his head would have exploded if this happened.
 
Posts: 364 | Registered: 04 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Guru
Posted Hide Post
?

explain
 
Posts: 778 | Registered: 19 February 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Jedi
Posted Hide Post
Hmm..

The thing is, I'm betting the network execs told them "Don't do anything that could be construed by anything as sexually suggestive". So maybe Mick was so paranoid about gyrating the wrong way he couldn't figure out what to do on stage.

At least the Stones played some good songs, badly, though. This one time when Aerosmith was switching out with a boy band, and they kept going back and forth, and then *Nelly* hobbled out...bleck. The Stones halftime performance was a fender bender to the usual train wreck.

(One small comment...acknowledging that the art you like isn't marketable to mainstream audiences is *not* the same as snobbery.)
 
Posts: 1783 | Location: Around Boston. | Registered: 24 February 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Guru
Posted Hide Post
Seal the coffin.
 
Posts: 680 | Location: Tampa, FL | Registered: 22 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

Metacritic    Metacritic Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Music  Hop To Forums  Rock    Should the Stones go Away?

©2006 CNET Networks Inc. All rights reserved.
 
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | BOOKS | TV | About Metacritic metacritic.com