quote:
Originally posted by ericg75:
1. Before Sunset. One of a few cases in cinematic history where the sequel outdoes the original by a longshot. I liked how Linklater did a continuation of the story, but didn't cave-in and give it a nicely wrapped up ending. It's just as loose and bittersweet as the first.
Hear hear. Well, I didn't actually like
Before Sunrise at all - I found Jesse (Ethan Hawke) almost unbearably callow in it - so it was a pleasant surprise to see that the character now had a kind of lived-in humility. Both performances were good, and the length was just right.
quote:
2. The Bourne Supremacy. I love when action movies are done right, and this was a definite case. Although I think the first one (The Bourne Identity) had a better story, This was a better film. Paul Greengrass trumped everything Doug Limon did on the first one. I hope he stays on for the Bourne Ultimatum.
I second this one too; sure, the car chase scenes were great (if a little too reminiscent of
Ronin at times) but I thought it was the climactic, non-action confrontation that really elevated the film - and there's some great work from Matt Damon in it.
I'd also put in my vote for
The Empire Strikes Back and
The Godfather, Part II as sequels that build beautifully on the originals, largely because they don't make the mistake of trying to
be the originals - they opt to be original instead (just like the originals were). I know that's an unoriginal thought, but there you go. You've gotta have a new story to tell. To that end, I'd quite seriously give my gold star to
Toy Story 2, which has a new story, maintains the excitement of the original and deepens it.
Nickel-Z, Tarantino did talk for a while about a prequel called
The Vega Brothers, a story featuring Vic (Michael Madsen,
Reservoir Dogs) and Vincent (John Travolta,
Pulp Fiction) Vega, but I suspect the actors are both probably getting a bit too old to do a prequel convincingly now. I guess there's always the possibility of a sequel starring Jules, but Samuel L. Jackson ain't exactly as underexposed as he used to be...
Sequels that shouldn't have been made: Sigh... this'll be an on-topic post for me today, having done some Cameron-bashing in another thread earlier re.
Titanic, and I
promise I'm not doing it just to be contrary - but
Terminator 2: Judgement Day is a vastly inferior sequel. No, I didn't think much of
T3 either, but at least it was leaner than
T2, which was incredibly bloated and slow compared to the streamlined original (still my favourite Cameron film, incidentally). And if you're making a time-travel film there ought to be a legally-enforceable statute about making sure it makes sense, which the first
Terminator does impeccably and the second abjectly fails to do.
And, yeah,
Ocean's 12 and its ilk, obviously.
Sequels that shouldn't be made:
Toy Story 3 -
especially without Pixar involved (I think it's now on hold, as talks have resumed between Disney and Pixar again). Disney will damage the characters and make themselves look stupid if they proceed, unless they've got a crackerjack story. And if Disney's in-house animation department is overflowing with crackerjack stories, it's only because they haven't been
using any of them for ten years.
Sequels that should be made:
Ferris Bueller's Midlife Crisis.
Sequels that should have been made, just for the title alone: the mooted sequel for
Dude, Where's My Car? had a working title of
Seriously, Dude, Where's My Car? I wasn't a great fan of the first film, but I'd see the sequel on principle if it had that title. I realise that that says more about me than I'd like.